Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. D.L.D., Appellant. (2022)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

In the INTEREST OF: N.L.D. and N.G-A.D.; Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. D.L.D., Appellant.

WD 84710 CONSOLIDATED WITH WD 84711

Decided: April 19, 2022

Before Division One: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, Alok Ahuja, and Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judges

Charles W. Hatfield, Alixandra Cossette, Jefferson City, for appellant. Arturo A. Hernandez, III, Jefferson City, for respondent, Juvenile Officer.

Order

D.L.D. appeals the termination of his parental rights to his children, N.L.D. and N.G-A.D. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the circuit court's judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Per Curiam

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network