NORTON v. STATE (2022)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Ricky R. NORTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 84295

Decided: April 12, 2022

Before Division Three: Anthony Rex Gabbert, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick and Thomas N. Chapman, Judges

Rosemary E. Percival, Kansas City for appellant. Sarah Ernst, Jefferson City for respondent.

Order

Ricky Norton appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying the motion. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would not have precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Per Curiam

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network