STATE v. MCDONALD (2022)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Steven Carl MCDONALD, Appellant.

WD 84397

Decided: March 15, 2022

Before Division Three: Anthony Rex Gabbert, P.J., Lisa White Hardwick and Thomas N. Chapman, JJ.

William Swift, Columbia, MO, Counsel for Appellant. Nathan Aquino, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

ORDER

Steven McDonald appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, for possession of a controlled substance and unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia. McDonald challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the convictions. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum explaining the reasons for this decision is provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law