Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. J.A.L., Appellant. (2022)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

In the INTEREST OF: H.R.L., Respondent; Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. J.A.L., Appellant.

WD 84717

Decided: March 08, 2022

Before Division Three: Anthony Rex Gabbert, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick, Judge, Thomas N. Chapman, Judge

Lori A. Fluegel, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Respondent. Blake D. Smith, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

ORDER

J.A.L. appeals the judgment of the Jackson County Circuit Court terminating his parental rights to his daughter H.R.L. In five points on appeal, J.A.L. claims the grounds for termination are not supported by substantial evidence and that the court abused its discretion in finding that termination of parental rights was in the child's best interest. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network