GOLSTON v. STATE (2021)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Antonio GOLSTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 84072

Decided: December 28, 2021

Before Division Two: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Presiding Judge, and Gary D. Witt and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judges

Justin Ortiz, Assistant Public Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant. Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, and Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Order

Mr. Antonio Golston appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 amended motion for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel for counsel's failure to object to alleged hearsay testimony. We affirm and have provided the parties with an unpublished legal memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network