In the Interest of: P.C.B., Appellant, v. JUVENILE OFFICER (2021)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

In the Interest of: P.C.B., Appellant, v. JUVENILE OFFICER, Respondent.

WD 84266

Decided: November 23, 2021

Before Division Two: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Presiding Judge, Karen King Mitchell, Judge, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge

Damien S De Loyola, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant. Michael A Herrin, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

ORDER

P.C.B. appeals the judgment of the Jackson County Circuit Court sustaining the allegation that he committed acts, which if he were an adult would constitute burglary in the first degree, section 569.160, RSMo. He raises three points on appeal. P.C.B. complains that the trial court erred in finding sufficient evidence to sustain the allegations against him and in refusing to admit another party's prior guilty plea. He also claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network