Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
John M. TRAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
ORDER
John M. Tran appeals from the Circuit Court of Jackson County's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point on appeal, Tran argues the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by effectively limiting his cross-examination of a State's witness by way of a pre-trial agreement with the prosecutor. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
PER CURIAM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: WD 83963
Decided: October 19, 2021
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)