MIRFASIHI v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY (2021)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Mav MIRFASIHI, Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

WD 84252

Decided: October 12, 2021

Before Division One: Alok Ahuja, P.J., and Lisa White Hardwick and Anthony Rex Gabbert, JJ.

Tyse Samani, North Kansas City, for appellant. Mimi E. Doherty, Kansas City, for respondent.

ORDER

Attorney Mav Mirfasihi filed a lawsuit against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company in the Circuit Court of Clay County. Mirfasihi alleged claims for civil conspiracy, violation of the attorney's lien statute (§ 484.140, RSMo), and tortious interference with contract. Mirfasihi's claims arose from State Farm's payments to third parties for property damage in connection with an automobile accident involving one of Mirfasihi's clients. Mirfasihi contended that he was entitled to an attorney's fee as a result of State Farm's payments. The circuit court granted summary judgment to State Farm, and Mirfasihi appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided an unpublished memorandum to the parties which sets forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network