Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. M.H., Appellant. (2021)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

In the INTEREST OF: BABY BOY H.: Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. M.H., Appellant.

WD 84322

Decided: July 27, 2021

Before Division Four: Cynthia L. Martin, Chief Judge, Presiding, Gary D. Witt, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge

Lori A. Fluegel, Kansas City, MO, for respondent. Tracy L. Spradlin, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

ORDER

M.H. appeals from the trial court's judgment terminating her parental rights to Baby Boy H. Mother argues on appeal that the trial court erred in concluding that grounds existed for terminating Mother's parental rights. Mother also asserts that the trial court erred in finding that termination of Mother's parental rights was in Child's best interests. Because Mother has not challenged each of the statutory bases found by the trial court to support termination of her parental rights, and because a preponderance of the evidence establishes that Child's best interests are served by termination of Mother's parental rights, we find no error, and affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Per curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network