STATE v. WILSON (2021)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Daniel L. WILSON, Appellant.

WD 83611

Decided: May 18, 2021

Before Division Four: Cynthia L. Martin, Chief Judge, Presiding, Lisa White Hardwick and W. Douglas Thomson, Judges

Kathryn M. Merwald, Kansas City, for appellant. Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Order

Daniel Wilson appeals from the circuit court's judgment after he pleaded guilty to second-degree murder and armed criminal action. Wilson contends that the court erred in denying his Rule 29.07 motion to withdraw his guilty plea on the basis that the court misunderstood his grounds for relief. He also contends that the court erred because the record supports a finding that he involuntarily and unintelligently pleaded guilty. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)

Per Curiam

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network