BALDWIN v. STATE (2021)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Wesley M. BALDWIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 83993

Decided: May 04, 2021

Before Division One: Anthony Rex Gabbert, P.J., Edward R. Ardini, Jr., and Thomas N. Chapman, JJ.

Matthew Palmer, Columbia, MO, Counsel for Appellant. Julia Rives, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

ORDER

Wesley Baldwin appeals from a Boone County motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, which alleged that he received ineffective assistance from his appellate counsel in his direct appeal. In his sole point on appeal, Baldwin asserts that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion for postconviction relief because his appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to contest the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction for first-degree assault. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum explaining our decision has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law