In the Interest of: C.D.J., Appellant, v. OFFICER (2021)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

In the Interest of: C.D.J., Appellant, v. Juvenile OFFICER, Respondent.

WD 83873

Decided: April 27, 2021

Before Division Three: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, Gary D. Witt, Judge, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge

Craig Allan Johnston, Columbia, MO, Counsel for Appellant. Lora A. Fluegel, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

ORDER

C.D.J. appeals the judgment of Family Court Division of the Jackson County Circuit Court finding that C.D.J. committed, what would be if he were an adult, the class A felony of robbery in the first degree and the class B felony of burglary in the first degree. C.D.J. complains in his sole point on appeal that the evidence did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was involved in the commission of those offenses and that the court's finding was against the weight of the evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law