DIMMERLING v. BECK (2021)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Ronald Joseph DIMMERLING, Respondent, v. Shawn BECK and Kelli Beck, Appellants.

WD 83797

Decided: April 20, 2021

Before Division One: Anthony Rex Gabbert, P.J., Edward R. Ardini, Jr., and Thomas N. Chapman, JJ.

Shawn Beck, Bolckow, MO, Appellant Acting Pro Se. Kelli Beck, Bolckow, MO, Appellant Acting Pro Se. Keith Schieber, St., Joseph, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

ORDER

Shawn Beck and Kelli Beck appeal, pro se, from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Nodaway County after a bench trial. The judgment granted the proceeds from the sale of a donkey to Ronald Dimmerling. The Becks’ sole point on appeal alleges that the judgment was not supported by substantial evidence, was against the weight of the evidence, and misapplied the law. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum explaining our decision has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law