CLARK v. STATE (2021)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nathan D. CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 83277

Decided: April 06, 2021

Division Two: W. Douglas Thomson, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge

Nathan D. Clark, Appellant Pro-se. Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

ORDER

Nathan Clark appeals, pro se, from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Clark claims the motion court erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion because the motion court failed to (1) determine three claims contained in his amended pro se Rule 24.035 motion; (2) order post-conviction counsel to amend his Rule 24.035 motion; and (3) determine all claims in his original pro se Rule 24.035 motion and his amended pro se Rule 24.035 motion. We affirm. Rule 84.16 (b).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network