MIDDLEBROOK v. STATE (2021)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Patrick R. MIDDLEBROOK, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 83491

Decided: March 30, 2021

Division One: Thomas N. Chapman, Presiding Judge, Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge and W. Douglas Thomson, Judge

Nancy A. McKerrow, Columbia, for Appellant. Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

ORDER

Patrick R. Middlebrook appeals from the Circuit Court of Buchanan County's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. In his two points on appeal, Middlebrook alleges the trial court erred because trial counsel failed to object to the State's amended information or request a bill of particulars, and because trial counsel failed to object to the verdict directing instruction. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law