Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Pearline MCFALL, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent.
ORDER
Pearline McFall appeals pro se from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her unemployment benefits. In her sole point on appeal, McFall claims that the Commission's determination that she left her employment voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work or to her employer was not supported by competent and substantial evidence. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
PER CURIAM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: WD 83744
Decided: February 23, 2021
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)