Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Shawn M. SCHNEIDER, Appellant.
ORDER
Shawn Schneider appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, of second-degree rape and trespass. On appeal, Schneider claims the trial court abused its discretion in excluding evidence that Schneider voluntarily returned to jail when he was improperly released because evidence showing a consciousness of innocence is admissible and, in the alternative, even if the evidence was inadmissible, the State opened the door by introducing substantial evidence of Schneider's belligerence when he was arrested. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
PER CURIAM:
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: WD 82585
Decided: January 26, 2021
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)