Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ryan M. BEAMGARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
ORDER
Ryan Beamgard appeals the circuit court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion, following an evidentiary hearing, after Beamgard pled guilty to six offenses. Beamgard contends the circuit court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion, arguing the record leaves a definite and firm impression that the plea court violated Rule 24.02 and Beamgard's constitutional rights by failing to inform Beamgard that the maximum penalty included the possibility of consecutive sentences, rendering Beamgard's guilty plea unknowing and involuntary. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Per Curiam:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: WD 85039
Decided: December 20, 2022
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)