BEAMGARD v. STATE (2022)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Ryan M. BEAMGARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 85039

Decided: December 20, 2022

Before Division Three: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge

Jeannie Marie Willibey, Kansas City, MO for Appellant. Kristen Shively Johnson, Jefferson City, MO for Respondent.

ORDER

Ryan Beamgard appeals the circuit court's judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion, following an evidentiary hearing, after Beamgard pled guilty to six offenses. Beamgard contends the circuit court clearly erred in denying his Rule 24.035 motion, arguing the record leaves a definite and firm impression that the plea court violated Rule 24.02 and Beamgard's constitutional rights by failing to inform Beamgard that the maximum penalty included the possibility of consecutive sentences, rendering Beamgard's guilty plea unknowing and involuntary. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network