SINDEN v. STATE (2020)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Roy SINDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 83183

Decided: December 22, 2020

Before Division Two: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton and Karen King Mitchell, Judges

Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, MO for appellant. Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City for respondent.

Order

Roy Sinden appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after he was convicted of driving while intoxicated. Sinden contends that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to assert on direct appeal that the circuit court erred in overruling his motion to strike the venire panel. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment denying post-conviction relief. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Per Curiam

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network