CAREY v. STATE (2020)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

De'Zahn CAREY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 83210

Decided: November 17, 2020

Before Division One: Thomas N. Chapman, P.J., Mark D. Pfeiffer and W. Douglas Thomson, JJ.

Jeannie Willibey, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant. Karen Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

ORDER

De'Zahn Carey appeals from a Jackson County motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after a hearing. Carey's motion alleged ineffective assistance of counsel for his counsel's failure to file a motion to suppress a statement that Carey gave to law enforcement officers. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network