Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. C.D.M, Appellant. (2020)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

In the INTEREST OF: M.E.N.W., A.L.W., C.C.W., D.L.W., B.L.W., Juveniles, Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. C.D.M, Appellant.

WD 83284 (Consolidated with WD 83285, WD 83286, WD 83287, WD 83288)

Decided: September 15, 2020

Division One: Thomas H. Newton, Presiding Judge, Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge

Mary E. Barnard, for Respondent. Stephen C. Pratte, for Appellant.

ORDER

C.D.M. (“Mother”) appeals from the judgments of the Circuit Court of Callaway County terminating her parental rights to her five minor children. Mother raises five points on appeal arguing that the trial court's findings regarding the statutory grounds for termination were legally insufficient and not supported by the evidence and that the evidence did not support a finding that termination was in the best interests of the Children. Finding no error, we affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network