CAMPBELL v. BAKER (2020)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Adam CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. Gail BAKER, Thomas Mefford, and Mefford, Vaugnix and Associates, P.C., Respondents.

WD 82642

Decided: August 04, 2020

Before Division Two: Mark D. Pfeiffer, P.J., and Alok Ahuja and Gary D. Witt, JJ.

Danieal H. Miller, Columbia for appellant. Nicholas D. Savio, Kansas City for respondent.

ORDER

Gail Baker and Thomas Mefford, who were both employed by Mefford, Vaugniax and Associates, P.C., provided counseling and other professional services to members of Appellant Adam Campbell's family during child custody proceedings. Campbell sued Baker, Mefford, and their employer in the Circuit Court of Pettis County for negligence, alienation of affections, and negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The circuit court dismissed Campbell's petition for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted. Campbell appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided an unpublished memorandum to the parties which sets forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law