Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Nathan LAROSE and Natalie LaRose, Appellants, v. Robbie Eugene MCCARTER BY Lloyd MCCARTER, Next Friend and Guardian, Respondent.
Order
Husband and wife, Nathan and Natalie LaRose,1 appeal the judgment awarding them damages as a result of injuries Nathan suffered in a car accident. The LaRoses raise three points on appeal. They argue that the judgment (1) misapplied the law in failing to award Nathan the costs of future hip revision surgeries; (2) was against the weight of the evidence in failing to award such costs; and (3) failed to state the applicable post-judgment interest rate under § 408.040. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
FOOTNOTES
1. In places, we use the LaRoses’ first names for ease of reference; no familiarity or disrespect is intended.
Per Curiam:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: WD 83140
Decided: July 28, 2020
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)