LAROSE v. MCCARTER BY MCCARTER (2020)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Nathan LAROSE and Natalie LaRose, Appellants, v. Robbie Eugene MCCARTER BY Lloyd MCCARTER, Next Friend and Guardian, Respondent.

WD 83140

Decided: July 28, 2020

Before Division Two: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, and Anthony Rex Gabbert and W. Douglas Thomson, Judges

Andrew Gelbach and Samuel Gonzalez, Warrensburg, MO, Attorneys for Appellants. Mark D. Chuning and Todd C. Barrett, Kansas City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Order

Husband and wife, Nathan and Natalie LaRose,¹ appeal the judgment awarding them damages as a result of injuries Nathan suffered in a car accident. The LaRoses raise three points on appeal. They argue that the judgment (1) misapplied the law in failing to award Nathan the costs of future hip revision surgeries; (2) was against the weight of the evidence in failing to award such costs; and (3) failed to state the applicable post-judgment interest rate under § 408.040. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

FOOTNOTES

1. In places, we use the LaRoses’ first names for ease of reference; no familiarity or disrespect is intended.

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law