Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

LAGE v. STATE (2022)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jason LAGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 84945

Decided: November 29, 2022

Before Division Three: Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge

Mark Allen Grothoff, Columbia, MO for appellant. Zeb Charlton, Jefferson City, MO for respondent.

ORDER

Jason Lage appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion following an evidentiary hearing. Lage asserts that the motion court committed clear error in denying his post-conviction motion because his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to obtain gunshot residue testing on samples collected by police. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Per curiam:

Was this helpful?

Thank you for your feedback!

FindLaw Marketing Authority Suite

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network

LAGE v. STATE (2022)

Docket No: WD 84945

Decided: November 29, 2022

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Need to Find an Attorney?

Search our directory by legal issue

Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

For Legal Professionals

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign Up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Go to Learn About The Law

Need to Find an Attorney?

Search our directory by legal issue

Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

Copied to clipboard