Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. C.M. (Father) and H.C. (Mother), Appellants. (2020)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

In the INTEREST OF: A.M., R.M., and X.M. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. C.M. (Father) and H.C. (Mother), Appellants.

WD 82917 (Consolidated with WD 82918)

Decided: January 14, 2020

Before Division Four: Karen King Mitchell, Chief Judge, and Lisa White Hardwick and Cynthia L. Martin, Judges

Ryan F. Kaiser, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Respondent. Teresa Anderson, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant, C.M. Laura Higgins Tyler, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant, H.C. Catherine M. Wiehl, Kansas City, MO, Guardian ad litem.

Order

H.C. (Mother) and C.M. (Father) appeal the trial court’s judgments terminating their parental rights to their three children, A.M., R.M., and X.M. (Children). Mother and Father argue that the trial court’s findings regarding the statutory grounds for termination were legally insufficient and not supported by the evidence and that the evidence did not support a finding that termination was in Children’s best interests. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law