Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Kenneth SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Order
Kenneth Smith appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after he pled guilty to sixteen offenses charged in five cases. He contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that his plea counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and call mitigation witnesses at sentencing. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)
Per Curiam
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: WD 81985
Decided: October 29, 2019
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)