COVINGTON v. COVINGTON (2019)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Rakedra D. COVINGTON, Respondent, v. Brent R. COVINGTON, Appellant.

WD 82580

Decided: October 15, 2019

Before Division Two: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton and Mark D. Pfeiffer, Judges

Brent R. Covington, Sr., Grandview, appellant pro se. David S. Rauzi, Kansas City for respondent.

Order

Brent R. Covington (“Appellant”) appeals the circuit court's entry of a judgment granting an order of protection in favor of Rakedra D. Covington. (“Respondent”). Appellant contends the court erred in granting the protection order because Respondent did not present substantial evidence to support the court’s finding that Appellant was stalking, harassing, or following her or her new paramour. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Per Curiam

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network