LEMASTERS v. STATE (2019)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Daryl D. LEMASTERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81619

Decided: September 17, 2019

Before Division One: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Alok Ahuja, Judge

Damien S. De Loyola, for Appellant James W. Van Amburg, Platte City, Platte County, for Respondent

ORDER

Daryl Lemasters appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after evidentiary hearing. In two points on appeal, he complains that his trial counsel was ineffective in calling two witnesses to testify in his trial for statutory sodomy, enticement of a child, and sexual exploitation of a minor. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum explaining the reasons for the decision has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law