ROBERTS v. STATE (2022)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Owen L. ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 84953

Decided: November 15, 2022

Division One: W. Douglas Thomson, Presiding Judge, Alok Ahuja, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge

Michael K. Hill, St. Louis, for Appellant. Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

ORDER

Owen Roberts (“Roberts”) challenges the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. On appeal, Roberts argues that the motion court erred because his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate another potential suspect. We affirm. A published opinion would have no precedential value. We have provided the parties with an unpublished memorandum that sets forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network