DONAHOE v. STATE (2019)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Jack DONAHOE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81910

Decided: August 27, 2019

Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge and Thomas N. Chapman, Judge

S. Kate Webber, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Julia E. Rives, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

ORDER

Appellant Jack Donahoe (“Donahoe”) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Buchanan County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Donahoe pleaded guilty to one count of first-degree statutory sodomy, section 566.062. Donahoe contends that the motion court erred in denying his motion without holding an evidentiary hearing because his motion alleged facts which, if true, showed that his guilty plea was involuntary. For reasons explained more fully in a memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Per curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network