SUMINSKI v. WILLIAMS (2019)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Rebekah SUMINSKI Respondent, v. Travis WILLIAMS, Appellant.

WD 82231

Decided: August 27, 2019

Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge and Thomas N. Chapman, Judge

Brent L. Winterberg, Kansas City, for Respondent Matthew E. Terry, Lee's Summit, for Appellant

ORDER

Rebekah Suminski (“Suminski”) brought this action in the Circuit Court of Jackson County against Travis Williams (“Williams”) seeking partition of real property purchased while the two were in a relationship or, in the alternative, damages under theories of restitution, unjust enrichment and quantum meruit relating to funds paid by Suminski toward the property’s mortgage and home improvements that benefitted Williams. Williams counterclaimed asserting claims for rent and possession and compensation for damage allegedly caused by Suminski to the property. The trial court found in favor of Suminski on her unjust enrichment claim and dismissed Williams’s counterclaims with prejudice. Williams appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law