STATE v. EISELE (2019)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jeanne M. EISELE, Appellant.

WD 81463

Decided: July 30, 2019

Before Division One: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick and Gary D. Witt, Judges

Jedd C. Schneider, Columbia, for appellant. Benjamin J. Miller, Fulton for respondent.

Order

Jeanne Eisele appeals her conviction for driving while intoxicated following a bench trial. She contends the circuit court erred in denying her motion to suppress and admitting all evidence obtained as a result of the traffic stop because the stop was an unconstitutional seizure. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. Because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)

Per Curiam

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network