YEE v. CHOI (2019)

ORDER

Thic Lem Toy died in April 2016. Toy’s will named Daniel Yee as the personal representative of his estate. In January 2017, Yee filed a discovery of assets action pursuant to § 473.340, RSMo. The petition alleged that one of Toy’s three sons, Sammy Choi, exercised undue influence over Toy in August 2005, when Toy changed the terms of a brokerage account to add Choi as a joint tenant with rights of survivorship. The petition also alleged that Choi converted the assets in the brokerage account; that Choi knew or should have known that Toy did not intend to retitle the account; and that Choi was unjustly enriched by the 2005 change in account ownership. The circuit court granted Choi’s motion for summary judgment, finding that Yee’s claims were time-barred. Yee appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided an unpublished memorandum to the parties which sets forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM: