LOCKHART v. STATE (2019)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Stephen J. LOCKHART, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81597

Decided: June 18, 2019

Before Division One: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge

Keith P. O’Connor, for Appellant Shaun Mackelprang, Jefferson City, for Respondent

ORDER

Stephen Lockhart appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after evidentiary hearing. He complains on appeal that his appellate counsel’s failure to raise a meritorious Batson claim on direct appeal was ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law