Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. D.W. (Father), Appellant. (2019)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

In the INTEREST OF: T.W., Plaintiff, Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. D.W. (Father), Appellant.

WD 82326

Decided: May 14, 2019

Before Division One: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge

Lori A. Fluegel, for Respondent. Ross H Delong, Kansas City, for Appellant.

ORDER

D.W. appeals the termination of his parental rights with respect to his son T.W. In five points on appeal, he contends that the circuit court erred in finding statutory grounds for termination and that termination was in the child’s best interests. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum explaining the reasons for the decision has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network