PERDOMO PAZ v. STATE (2019)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Isaac PERDOMO-PAZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81257

Decided: April 16, 2019

Before Division Two: Edward R. Ardini, Jr., P.J., and Alok Ahuja and Gary D. Witt, JJ.

Natalie H. Hoge, Kansas City for appellant. Richard A. Starnes, Jefferson City for respondent.

ORDER

Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Clay County, Isaac Perdomo-Paz was convicted of two counts of murder in the first degree, one count of murder in the second degree, and three counts of armed criminal action. After we affirmed his convictions on direct appeal, Perdomo-Paz filed a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29.15. The motion court denied Perdomo-Paz’s motion following an evidentiary hearing. Perdomo-Paz appeals. He argues that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to object to evidence that, after Perdomo-Paz’s arrest, the motor vehicle he was driving on the night of the murders was sold and destroyed. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided an unpublished memorandum to the parties which sets forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law