Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. L.S. (Father), Appellant. (2019)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

In the INTEREST OF N.S.: Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. L.S. (Father), Appellant.

WD 82071

Decided: April 02, 2019

Before Division Three: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judges

Bruce B. Brown, Kearney for appellant. William E. Shull, Liberty; Joseph W. Vanover, Kansas City and Juliann W. Graves, Overland Park, for respondent.

Order

L.S. (“Father”) appeals from the judgment terminating his parental rights to his son, N.S. (“Son”). Father contends the evidence was insufficient to support the circuit court’s finding that he abandoned Son and that termination of his parental rights was in Son’s best interest. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network