EASLEY v. STATE (2019)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Aaron J. EASLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81112

Decided: February 26, 2019

Before Division One: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Thomas H. Newton, Judge

Susan L. Hogan, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

ORDER

Aaron J. Easley appeals the denial after an evidentiary hearing of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief which claimed he was denied due process when the sentencing court permitted the state to play, over defense counsel's objection, a video about his victim's life which included hearsay, and which Easley claims was prejudicial to the imposition of sentence. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Per curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network