BRANT v. STATE (2019)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Doyle E. BRANT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81096 (Consolidated with WD 81097 and WD 81098)

Decided: February 05, 2019

Before Division One: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Thomas H. Newton, Judge

Laura G. Martin, Kansas City, for Appellant. Julia E. Neidhardt, for Respondent.

ORDER

Doyle Brant appeals the judgment of the motion court, following an evidentiary hearing, denying his Rule 24.035 motions to set aside his convictions for two counts of second-degree statutory sodomy, three counts of second-degree statutory rape, and conspiracy to commit murder. He claims that he was denied effective assistance of counsel when plea counsel repeatedly advised him that if he pleaded guilty to all of the charges, he would be sentenced to three and a half years at the most. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network