Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

WEST v. STATE (2019)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Wayne E. WEST, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 81214

Decided: January 29, 2019

Before Division Four: Karen King Mitchell, Chief Judge, and Mark D. Pfeiffer and Thomas N. Chapman, Judges

Natalie Hull Hoge, Senior Public Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant. Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, and Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Order

Wayne West appeals, following an evidentiary hearing, the denial of his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, in which he argued that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and produce witnesses regarding the presence of other individuals at or near the scene of the crime when it occurred. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law

WEST v. STATE (2019)

Docket No: WD 81214

Decided: January 29, 2019

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Need to find an attorney?

Search our directory by legal issue

Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

For Legal Professionals

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Go to Learn About the Law

Need to find an attorney?

Search our directory by legal issue

Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

Copied to clipboard