Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
MODERN MOTORS, LLC, Respondent, v. Terry L. GERBER, Donald W. Gessley and Cathy Gerber, Appellants.
ORDER
Appellants Terry Gerber, Cathy Gerber, and Donald Gessley appeal from a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Cass County following a bench trial. The circuit court granted judgment to Respondent Modern Motors, LLC against Terry Gerber and Gessley on Modern Motors' claim for enforcement of a promissory note. The judgment awarded Modern Motors $107,025.40 in unpaid principal, interest and late fees, and $16,053.87 in attorney's fees. The circuit court also denied Gessley's counterclaim seeking to exercise a state-law right of redemption to an airplane which had been pledged as collateral for the promissory note, and denied Cathy Gerber's motion to intervene in the action to assert a claim for replevin of the airplane.
Appellants raise six points on appeal. They argue that the circuit court erroneously admitted the promissory note and an assignment agreement into evidence; that the judgment was unsupported by sufficient evidence (assuming that the note and assignment were erroneously admitted); that Modern Motors' retention of the security for the note (the airplane) had the effect of extinguishing the debt; that the circuit court erroneously rejected Gessley's attempt to enforce his redemption rights to the airplane; that the court erroneously denied Cathy Gerber's motion to intervene; and that the court erroneously calculated Modern Motors' recoverable attorneys' fees.
We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).
PER CURIAM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: WD 80732
Decided: January 22, 2019
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)