DAVIS v. STATE (2022)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Zachary Robert DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 84835

Decided: October 25, 2022

Division One: W. Douglas Thomson, Presiding Judge, Alok Ahuja, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge

Richard H. Sindel, St. Louis, for Appellant. Zeb Charlton, for Respondent.

ORDER

Zachary Robert Davis (“Davis”) appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Davis argues the motion court erred because his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file motions to suppress evidence or object to evidence obtained from the console of his vehicle and evidence obtained from his cell phone. We affirm. A published opinion would have no precedential value. We have provided the parties with an unpublished memorandum that sets forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network