HAWKINS v. STATE (2018)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Dequan A. HAWKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 80275

Decided: October 30, 2018

Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge

Carol D. Jansen, Columbia, MO, for appellant. Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

ORDER

Dequan Hawkins appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 amended motion following an evidentiary hearing. Hawkins asserts that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion for post-conviction relief because he received ineffective assistance of counsel in that his trial counsel failed to object to the admission of a witness's entire videotaped statement to police. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Per curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law