MCWILLIAMS v. PLUMLEE (2018)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

James Allan MCWILLIAMS, Respondent, v. Michelle (McWilliams) PLUMLEE, Appellant.

WD 81078

Decided: October 09, 2018

Before Division Four: Karen King Mitchell, Chief Judge, and Mark D. Pfeiffer and Cynthia L. Martin, Judges

James E. Switzer, Clinton, MO, Attorney for Respondent. Marilyn M. Shapiro, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Order

Michelle Plumlee (Wife) appeals the denial of her motion to modify an Amended Qualified Domestic Relations Order (Amended QDRO) awarding her 3.675% of James McWilliams’s (Husband’s) Ford Retirement Pension. In her sole point on appeal, Wife argues that the motion court erred in refusing to modify the Amended QDRO to quantify her 3.675% monthly share of the Pension by replacing the percentage with a specific dollar amount equaling that share. Because we conclude that the terms of the Amended QDRO effectuate the express intent of the parties' dissolution judgment, and thus the motion court did not err in denying Wife’s motion, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law