STATE v. HAROLD (2018)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Stuart HAROLD, Appellant.

WD 80597

Decided: May 01, 2018

Before Division Four: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Chief Judge, Presiding, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge, Edward R. Ardini Jr., Judge

Julia Elizabeth Neidhardt, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent. Christian Lehmberg, Columbia, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

ORDER

Stuart Harold appeals from a judgment convicting him of burglary in the first degree, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to show that when he unlawfully entered the Anson residence, he did so with the intent of assaulting Nicholas Haill. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network