EVANS v. CHILDERS (2018)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Randall EVANS, et al., Respondents, v. Russell CHILDERS, et al., Appellants.

WD 80786

Decided: April 10, 2018

Before Division One: Thomas H. Newton, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Karen King Mitchell, Judge

Sean P. Pilliard, Sedalia, for Appellants Steven A. Fritz, for Respondents

ORDER

Portico Properties, LLC, John Otten, and Russell Childers (collectively Defendants) appeal the summary judgment in favor of Randall Evans and Joyce Franklin (collectively Plaintiffs) on Plaintiff’s petition on note and guaranty. Defendants contend that the trial court erred in entering summary judgment against them on the promissory note because genuine issues of material fact existed. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM:

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law