Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jimmy JACKSON, Jr., Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Respondent.
ORDER
Jimmy Jackson, Jr. (“Jackson”) appeals from a judgment sustaining the Director of Revenue's suspension of his driving privileges. Jackson argues that the trial court erred in admitting the results of the breath alcohol test into evidence. Jackson claims the foundational requirements for admission of the test were not met because the test was not performed in accordance with regulations promulgated by the Department of Health and Senior Services (“DHSS”). Specifically, Jackson asserts that the police officer who administered the breath alcohol test did not continuously observe Jackson for the fifteen minutes immediately prior to the administration of the test. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Per curiam:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: WD 80785
Decided: April 10, 2018
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)