MOXLEY v. STATE (2018)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Steve Duane MOXLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 80716

Decided: March 27, 2018

Before Division IV: Mark D. Pfeiffer, Presiding Judge, and Cynthia L. Martin and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judges

Mark A. Grothoff, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, MO, Attorney for Appellant. Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Evan J. Buchheim, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Order

Mr. Steve Moxley appeals from the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Boone County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 amended motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Moxley claims that his trial counsel was ineffective in the cross-examination of a state’s witness. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law