Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. IV (2018)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

IN the INTEREST OF: A.W.: Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. C.J.W., IV (Father), Appellant.

WD 80834

Decided: February 20, 2018

Before Division Three: Gary D. Witt, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judges

Daniel C. Berezoski, Michael T. Raupp, Sierra J. Faler, Kansas City, for appellant. Michael A. Herrin, Lori A. Fluegel, Kansas City for respondent.

Order

C.J.W. appeals from the circuit court's judgment terminating his parental rights to his daughter, A.W. He contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the grounds for termination and the best interest findings. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b)

Per Curiam

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law