BASKERVILLE v. STATE (2018)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Rickey BASKERVILLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

WD 80021

Decided: January 30, 2018

Before Division Two: Anthony Rex Gabbert, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton, Judge, Gary D. Witt, Judge

Susan Lynn Hogan, Kansas City, MO, Counsel for Appellant. Dora Fichter, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

ORDER

Rickey Baskerville appeals a motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, after the Missouri Supreme Court affirmed his convictions and sentences for three counts of capital murder. He contends the court clearly erred, because deficient appellate counsel prejudiced his appeal by failing to address two errors, after trial counsel preserved the alleged errors for appeal: 1) a prosecutor’s misstatement of law during closing argument, and 2) the unlawful conditions of Baskerville’s pre-trial detention. Rule 84.16(b).

Per Curiam:

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law